Tagged: 

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #6388
      giamma Cgiamma C
      Participant

      Hello ProjectLibre team,
      I would like to report a limitation I found regarding the update of Actual Costs (ACWP) when a task is performing inefficiently.

      The Scenario:
      I have a task with the following baseline:
      Duration: 10 Days
      BCWS (Budget): 1,000 (e.g., 1 resource @ 100/day)

      The Reality:
      The 10 days have passed. The resource has worked for the full 10 days (so I have paid the full 1,000), but they have encountered issues and only achieved 10% of the physical work.

      The Problem:
      If I update the % Complete to 10%, ProjectLibre automatically recalculates the Actual Cost down to 100 (assuming only 1 day of Actual Duration). This is incorrect because I have actually incurred the full cost of 1,000.
      I cannot manually edit the Actual Cost cell to correct this figure to 1,000 because the field is read-only when resources are assigned.

      The Consequence:
      My Earned Value analysis is wrong. The software hides the cost overrun.
      Current (Wrong) Result: ACWP = 100, BCWP = 100. Cost Variance = 0.
      Expected (Correct) Result: ACWP = 1,000, BCWP = 100. Cost Variance = -900.

      My Question:
      Is there a way to decouple “Actual Work/Cost” from “% Complete”? How can I input that a resource has worked/consumed 100% of the budgeted hours while the task progress remains at only 10%, without having to use workarounds like “Fixed Costs”?
      Thank you for your support.

    • #9470

      Hello,
      I am not able to do a change from 0 value, in KPIs in EVM. What are the concrete steps to let ProjectLIbre Desktop calculate them, please?

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.